Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Family Law |
Keywords: | ; Standard of Review; Termination; Parental Rights; Preponderance of Evidence |
Jurisdiction: | Illinois |
Cited Cases: | None |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 03/01/2016 |
A trial court makes a determination to terminate parental rights using a preponderance of the evidence standard. In re D.T., 212 Ill.2d 347, 365 (2004). On review, an appeals court will assess whether that determination to terminate parental rights is against the manifest weight of the evidence. In re D.S., 2011 IL App. (3d) 110184, ¶ 33.
It is well settled that once a parent has been found to be unfit the focus shifts to what would be in the best interest of the child. In re D.T., 212 Ill.2d at 364. The issue is no longer whether parental rights can be terminated, but rather, "in light of the child’s needs, should the parental rights be terminated." (emphasis omitted) Id. Accordingly, a parent’s interest in maintaining the parent/child relationship must give way to the child’s interest in a stable, loving home life. Id.
Illinois’ parens patriae interest generally favors the preservation of the family. Id. at 366. However, "’once a court has found by clear and convincing evidence that a parent is unfit, the state’s interest in protecting the child is sufficiently compelling to allow the termination of parental rights.’" Id. (quoting In re R.C., 195 Ill. 2d 291, 308 (2001)).
In re K.L., No. 3-15-0731, 2016.IL.000232 (Feb. 2, 2016) (VersusLaw).
Date: March 1, 2016
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!