Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Collateral estoppel; Application |
Jurisdiction: | Federal, Florida |
Cited Cases: | 656 So. 2d 906; 470 U.S. 373 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 11/01/2012 |
Determining whether collateral estoppel applies in a given case requires the court “to refer to the preclusion law of the State in which judgment was rendered.” Marrese v. Am. Acad. of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 380 (1985). Under Florida law, collateral estoppel does not apply unless “the particular matter [was] fully litigated and determined in a contest which results in a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction” and “the parties and issues [are] identical” to those involved in another proceeding. Vasquez v. YII Shipping Co. Ltd., 692 F.3d 1192, 1196 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Servs. v. B.J.M., 656 So. 2d 906, 910 (Fla.1995)).
One party is not “in privity” with a party to the prior litigation unless he or she has “an interest in the action such that she will be bound by the final judgment as if she were a party.” Stogniew v. McQueen, 656 So. 2d 917, 920 (Fla. 1995).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!