Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Banking & Finance Law, Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Statute of limitations; Claim for reformation; Contract |
Jurisdiction: | Federal, Indiana |
Cited Cases: | 553 N.W.2d 760; 942 F. Supp. 2d 279; 289 P.3d 1066; 27 N.E. 200 |
Cited Statutes: | Indiana Code § 34-11-2-11, § 34-11-1-2(a) |
Date: | 09/01/2014 |
To determine whether a bank’s claim for reformation is barred by the statute of limitations and determine when the statute of limitations began to run, the following authorities are instructive:
“All actions upon contracts in writing other than those for the payment of money . . . must be commenced within ten (10) years after the cause of action accrues.”
Section 34-11-2-11 “does not apply to [a claim for reformation], as an action for reformation is not an action at law brought upon the contract. Rather, it is an action for the equitable remedy of reformation of the contract.”
Claim for reformation of a contract is not a claim upon the contract for statute of limitations purposes.
An action to reform a deed is an action “upon a contract.”
“A cause of action that: (1) arises on or after September 1, 1982; and (2) is not limited by any other statute; must be brought within ten (10) years.”
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!