Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Family Law |
Keywords: | Common-law marriage; Legally recognized; Cohabitation |
Jurisdiction: | District of Columbia |
Cited Cases: | 170 A.2d 778; 87 A.2d 403; 199 Md. 449; 201 A.2d 873 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 02/01/2001 |
A common law marriage is valid in the District of Columbia if the parties are legally capable of entering into the relationship, they mutually agree to do so, and cohabitation follows an express agreement to be husband and wife. Toye v. Toye, 170 A.2d 778 (D.C. 1961). If there is an impediment to marriage and they continue to cohabit after removal of the impediment, a valid common-law marriage exists. Lee v. Lee, 201 A.2d 873 (D.C. 1964); Taylor v. Taylor, 233 A.2d 43 (D.C. 1967). In Henderson v. Henderson, 199 Md. 449, 87 A.2d 403 (1952), a Maryland court held that cohabitation of parties in D.C. for about a year gave rise to a common law marriage under D.C. law.
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!