Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation Practice & Procedure, Litigation Practice and Procedure |
Keywords: | ; Relief; Complaint; Mandamus; Motion to Dismiss; Extraordinary Remedy |
Jurisdiction: | Illinois |
Cited Cases: | 980 N.E.2d 1115; 909 N.E.2d 783; 688 N.E.2d 81 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 03/01/2016 |
"Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy used to compel a public officer to perform nondiscretionary official duties." People ex rel. Senko v. Meersman, 2012 IL 114163, ¶ 9, 980 N.E.2d 1115 (citing People ex rel. Birkett v. Konetski, 233 Ill.2d 185, 192-93, 909 N.E.2d 783, 791 (2009)). For a complaint seeking mandamus relief to withstand a motion to dismiss, "it must allege facts which establish a clear right to the relief requested, a clear duty of the respondent to act, and clear authority in the respondent to comply with the writ." Noyola v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 179 Ill.2d 121, 133, 688 N.E.2d 81, 86 (1997).
Cebertowicz. v. Baldwin, No. 4-15-0289, 2016.IL.0000237 (Feb. 4, 2016) (VersusLaw).
Date: March 1, 2016
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!