Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights |
Keywords: | Minnesota Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (MUFTA); Claim; Right to payment |
Jurisdiction: | Federal, Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 912 F.2d 1023 |
Cited Statutes: | Minn. Stat. § 513.41(3) |
Date: | 01/01/2013 |
A “claim” exists only if the creditor challenging the transfer had a “right to payment.” Minn. Stat. § 513.41(3)). A “right to payment” means nothing more nor less than an enforceable obligation. Cohen v. De la Cruz, 523 U.S. 213, 218 (1998)). A guarantor’s obligation under a guaranty does not arise until after the debtor defaults. United States v. Vanornum, 912 F.2d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 1990)).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!