Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Business Organizations & Contracts |
Keywords: | Tortious interference with contract; Damages |
Jurisdiction: | Wisconsin |
Cited Cases: | 138 Wis. 2d 273; 405 N.W.2d 759; 122 Wis. 2d 656; 364 N.W.2d 158; 240 Wis. 2d 327; 620 N.W.2d 797 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 03/01/2015 |
In general, damages for tortious interference consist of the “pecuniary loss of the benefits of the contract or prospective contract.” Cudd v. Crownhart, 122 Wis. 2d 656, 659-60, 364 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1985); see also Musa v. Jefferson Cnty. Bank, 2001 WI 2, ¶ 29, 240 Wis. 2d 327, 620 N.W.2d 797. These are essentially the same type damages as recoverable with respect to a breach of contract claim.
However, in an appropriate case, special damages are also recoverable, including, for example, other expenses plaintiff incurred that are shown to be caused by the defendant’s tortious interference. Id. (even mental health treatment expenses have been found to be recoverable if necessitated by the interference).
Punitive damages may also be available in an appropriate tortious interference case. Musa, 2001 WI 2 at ¶ 29. By contrast, punitive damages are not available on a breach of contract claim. Autumn Grove Joint Venture v. Rachlin, 138 Wis. 2d 273, 279, 405 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1987).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!