X

Legal Memorandum: Denial of Summary Judgment

Issue: Whether the summary judgment standard requires that defendants’ motion be denied.

Area of Law: Litigation & Procedure
Keywords: Summary Judgment; Genuine issues of material fact
Jurisdiction: Federal
Cited Cases: None
Cited Statutes: Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)
Date: 05/01/2007

Defendants, the parties moving for summary judgment, must demonstrate both the absence of any genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986).  “This burden remains with the moving party regardless of which party would have the burden of persuasion at trial.”  Aman v. Cort Furniture Rental Corp., 85 F.3d 1074, 1080 (3d Cir. 1996).

When determining whether the moving parties have carried this burden, the court must regard the facts asserted by the non-moving party, supported by evidence, as true.  See id. at 1080.  All inferences to be drawn from such underlying evidence “must be viewed in light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.”  Id. at 1080-81 (emphasis added).  Any doubt as to the existence of a genuine issue for trial should be resolved against the moving party. Celotex, 477 U.S. at 330 n.2.  “Viewed under this lens, if there is any evidence in the record from any source from which a reasonable inference in the nonmoving party’s favor may be drawn, the moving party simply cannot obtain summary judgment.”  Aman, 85 F.3d at 1081 (quoting Celotex, 477 U.S. at 330 n.2) (internal punctuation omitted)).

[…]

Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder

To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!

(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)