Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Personal Injury & Negligence |
Keywords: | Proximate cause; Substantial factor; Cause of injury |
Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 539 N.W.2d 398 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 04/01/2013 |
Proximate cause is a necessary element in every negligence case; however, whether a particular incident is the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injury is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury. Lubbers v. Anderson, 539 N.W.2d 398, 402 (Minn. 1995). Only when “reasonable minds could reach only one conclusion, is the existence of proximate cause a question of law.” Id. See Osbourne v. Twin Town Bowl, 749 N.W.2d 367, 372 (Minn. 2008) (“we long ago defined a proximate cause of a given result as ‘a material element or a substantial factor in the happening of that result.'”). Generally, a given event need not be the sole cause of injury to be a proximate cause; it is enough “if it is a co-operating, concurring, or proximately contributing cause.” Osbourne, 749 N.W.2d at 373 n.3; see also Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 704 (2004) (“Proximate cause is causation substantial enough and close enough to the harm to be recognized by law, but a given proximate cause need not be, and frequently is not, the exclusive proximate cause of harm.”).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!