Issue: Under the New Mexico Rules of Evidence, when will a court find that evidence, otherwise characterized as hearsay, does not fall within the rule?
|Area of Law:||Litigation & Procedure, Uncategorized|
|Keywords:||; Evidence; Hearsay; Declarant|
|Cited Cases:||120 N.M. 220; 900 P.2d 969|
To prevail on a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, plaintiff is required to prove the existence of a fiduciary duty, a breach of that duty by the defendant, and damages proximately caused by the breach. See Neade v. Portes, 193 Ill.2d 433, 444 (2000).
American Enterprise Bank v. Becker, 2016.IL.150179-U (Ill. App. Dist. 2. Jan. 28, 2016) (not precedential).
Date: March 1, 2016