Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Business Organizations & Contracts, Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Personal jurisdiction; Intentional tort; Court |
Jurisdiction: | Virgin Islands |
Cited Cases: | None |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 04/01/2015 |
In order for a court to exercise personal jurisdiction over an intentional business tort, the plaintiff must allege:
1) The defendant committed an intentional tort;
2) The plaintiff felt the brunt of the harm in the forum such that the forum can be said to be the focal point of the harm suffered by the plaintiff as a result of that tort; [and]
3) The defendant expressly aimed his tortious conduct at the forum such that the forum can be said to be the focal point of the tortious activity[.]
IMO Indus. v. Kiekert AG, 155 F.3d 254, 265-66 (3d Cir. 1998).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!