Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Personal Injury & Negligence |
Keywords: | Liability of a seller or distributor; Products liability action |
Jurisdiction: | Massachusetts |
Cited Cases: | 787 F.2d 726; 616 N.E.2d 1081 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 01/01/2000 |
To hold a manufacturer, seller or other party in the chain of distribution accountable, there must first be proof that the defendant manufactured, sold, or was in some other way responsible for the product, since the particular defendant must owe a duty to the particular plaintiff in order to be liable. Carrier v. Riddell, Inc., 721 F.2d 867, 868-69 (1st Cir. 1983); 3 Massachusetts Jurisprudence, Products Liability §§ 33:69 (Law. Co-op. 1992) (citing 1 American Law of Products Liability 3d § 5:1). A seller or distributor of products manufactured by another is not liable in a negligence action, however, unless it knew or had reason to know of the dangerous condition of the product, Enrich v. Windmere Corp., 416 Mass. 83, 86, 616 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 (1993), or unless it held itself out to the public as the product’s manufacturer, Laaperi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 787 F.2d 726, 731 n.2 (1st Cir. 1986).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!