Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Personal jurisdiction; Defendant; Privilege of acting |
Jurisdiction: | Wyoming |
Cited Cases: | 620 P.2d 5; 556 F.3d 1095 |
Cited Statutes: | Wyo. Stat. § 5‑1‑107(a) |
Date: | 12/01/2014 |
Wyoming courts are authorized to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant on any basis which is not inconsistent with the Wyoming or United States constitutions. Wyo. Stat. § 5‑1‑107(a). To make this determination, the Wyoming Supreme Court adopted a three-part test for defining the outer limits of personal jurisdiction based on a single act:
First Wyo. Bank, N.A., Rawlins v. Trans Mountain Sales & Leasing, Inc., 602 P.2d 1219, 1221 (Wyo. 1979). Although first adopted in 1979, this remains the test today. Black Diamond Energy Partners 2001-A Ltd. v. S&T Bank, 278 P.3d 738, 742 (Wyo. 2012).
With respect to the requirement that the defendant purposefully avails him/herself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or of causing important consequences in the state, this can be satisfied by either acting in the form state or causing important consequences in the state. That is, the defendant will satisfy the first factor if he purposely avails himself of the privilege of either “acting in the forum state or causing […]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!