Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure, Personal Injury & Negligence |
Keywords: | Future medical expenses; Evidence; Damages |
Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 450 N.W.2d 353 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 04/01/2013 |
To recover future medical expenses, a plaintiff must show two elements by a preponderance of evidence. First, he must demonstrate that it is likely that future medical treatments will be required. Second, he must establish the amount the expenses are likely to be. Lind v. Slowinski, 450 N.W.2d 353, 358 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990); Kwapien v. Starr, 400 N.W.2d 179, 184 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Expert testimony is not the exclusive means of proving future damage. See Pagett v. No. Elec. Supply Co., 167 N.W.2d 58, 65 (Minn. 1969); Gensler v. Paulson, No. A04-609 at *3 (Minn. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2005) (unpublished) (noting that record containing evidence of past treatment and life expectancy was sufficient).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!