Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Employee Law |
Keywords: | Qualified individual with a disability; Essential job function |
Jurisdiction: | Federal |
Cited Cases: | 101 F.3d 1090; 137 F.3d 398; 145 F.3d 846; 150 F.3d 52; 50 F.3d 1261 |
Cited Statutes: | 42 U.S.C. §12112(a); 42 U.S.C. §12111(8); 42 U.S.C.A. §12111(3) |
Date: | 02/01/2000 |
A "qualified individual with a disability" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §12112 TA l "42 U.S.C.A. §12112" s "42 U.S.C.A. §12112" c 2 (a) is defined as "an individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires." 42 U.S.C. §12111 TA l "42 U.S.C.A. §12111" s "42 U.S.C.A. §12111" c 2 (8). "A disabled individual, however, is not ‘qualified’ for a specific employment position if he or she poses a ‘direct threat’ to the health or safety of others which cannot be eliminated by a reasonable accommodation." Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center, 137 F.3d 398, 402 (6th Cir.1998) (citing 42 U.S.C.A. §12111(3) TA l "Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center, 137 F.3d 398, 402 (6th Cir.1998) (citing 42 U.S.C.A. §12111(3)" s "Mauro" c 1 and Doe v. Univ. of Maryland Medical System Corp., 50 F.3d 1261, 1265 (4th Cir. 1995) TA l "Doe v. Univ. of Maryland Medical System Corp., 50 F.3d 1261, 1265 (4th Cir. 1995)" s "Doe" c 1 ). Furthermore, the "’direct threat’ standard applied in the Americans With Disabilities Act is based on the same standard as ‘significant risk’ applied by the Rehabilitation Act." Id. […]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!