Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure, Personal Injury & Negligence |
Keywords: | An award of punitive damages; Recover; Malicious or wanton and reckless |
Jurisdiction: | New York |
Cited Cases: | 596 N.Y.S.2d 136; 222 A.D.2d 876; 634 N.Y.S.2d 880; 199 A.D.2d 869 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 05/01/2000 |
In order to recover an award of punitive damages, it is necessary that the plaintiff prove that the act complained of was either “malicious” or “wanton and reckless.” N.Y.P.J.I.3d 2:278; Harrell v. Champlain Enter., Inc., 222 A.D.2d 876, 876-877, 634 N.Y.S.2d 880, 881 (3rd Dep’t 1995); Dumesnil v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 199 A.D.2d 869, 870 , 606 N.Y.S.2d 394, 396 (3rd Dep’t 1993). A party cannot be held vicariously liable for an award of punitive damages against an agent of that party unless there is evidence that the party condoned or participated in the conduct supporting an award of punitive damages. Kelleher v. F.M.E. Auto Leasing Corp., 192 A.D.2d 581, 596 N.Y.S.2d 136 (2nd Dep’t 1993).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!