Issue: In New Jersey, what deference does an appellate court owe to a trial court’s non-jury decision?
| Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
| Keywords: | Non‑jury civil actions; Findings of fact and conclusions of law |
| Jurisdiction: | New Jersey |
| Cited Cases: | 191 A.2d 61; 65 N.J. 474; 78 N.J. Super. 154; 188 A.2d 43; 40 N.J. 221; 323 A.2d 495 |
| Cited Statutes: | None |
| Date: | 11/01/2000 |
In reviewing a trial court’s conclusions in a non‑jury civil action, the appeals court is bound to grant substantial deference to the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 483‑84, 323 A.2d 495 (1974). A trial court’s conclusions should not be disturbed unless the court is "convinced that they are so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant and reasonably credible evidence as to offend the interests of justice." Id. at 484, 323 A.2d 495 (quoting Fagliarone v. Township of N. Bergen, 78 N.J. Super. 154, 155, 188 A.2d 43 (App. Div.), cert. denied, 40 N.J. 221, 191 A.2d 61 (1963)).
[…]