Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss; Failure to state a claim |
Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 582 N.W.2d 273; 122 N.W.2d 26; 636 N.W.2d 334; 540 N.W.2d 494 |
Cited Statutes: | Rule 12(b)(6) |
Date: | 12/01/2012 |
For purposes of a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept the facts in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable and favorable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. Pullar v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 701, 582 N.W.2d 273, 275-76 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). At this stage of the proceedings, whether the plaintiff can prove the facts alleged is immaterial. Stead-Bowers v. Langley, 636 N.W.2d 334, 338 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). A complaint may be dismissed only when it is clear from the face of the complaint that the claim is legally deficient. N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 122 N.W.2d 26, 29 (Minn. 1963).
Although a district court typically may not consider documents other than the complaint without converting the motion into one for summary judgment, the court may consider a document if the complaint refers to it and it is central to the claims alleged. In re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494, 497 (Minn. 1995).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!