Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Appellate review; Findings of fact and conclusions of law; Substantial evidence |
Jurisdiction: | Washington |
Cited Cases: | 807 P.2d 885; 60 Wash. App. 751 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 09/01/2000 |
In an appeal, the job of the appellate court is to determine whether the findings of fact and conclusions of law are supported by substantial evidence, and whether the findings, if supported by substantial evidence, support the conclusion. Taplett v. Khela, 60 Wash. App. 751, 758-59, 807 P.2d 885, 889 (1991). The absence of any finding at all on a particular issue is presumptively a negative finding that was decided against the plaintiff, as the party with the burden of proof. Id., 60 Wash. App. at 760, 807 P.2d at 889.
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!