A court may strike a brief in whole or in part if it contains improprieties that are so severe as to hinder its review. See, e.g., Hall v. Naper Gold Hospitality LLC, 2012 IL App. (2d) 111151, ¶ 9 (the appellant’s brief violated numerous court rules and contained a statement of facts describing a case other than the one being appealed). When a brief contains improper argumentation that does not interfere with the court’s review, a proper remedy may be to disregard the offending statements. See Cottrill v. Russell, 253 Ill. App. 3d 934, 938 (1993).
N.M. v. Volgmann, No. 2-15-0014 2016.IL.0000275 (Ill. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 2016) (VersusLaw).
Date: March 1, 2016 […]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!