Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation & Procedure |
Keywords: | Special proceedings; Declaratory judgment actions |
Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 151 N.W.2d 584 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 03/01/2015 |
The Minnesota Supreme Court has specifically held that declaratory judgment actions are not special proceedings. See Beatty v. Winona Hous. & Redev. Auth., 277 Minn. 76, 79-80, 151 N.W.2d 584, 587 (1967). In the Beatty case, the court explained that, in special proceedings, judgments are unauthorized, and because of that orders entered in those cases are appealable. Id. at 79, 151 N.W.2d at 586. Special proceedings usually mean proceedings that may be commenced independently of a pending action by petition or motion, upon notice, in order to obtain special relief. The Beatty court specifically stated that the declaratory judgment action before it did not constitute a special proceeding. Id. Obviously, judgments are not unauthorized in declaratory judgment cases.
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!