Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Employee Law |
Keywords: | Discharge of a public employee; Plaintiff's speech |
Jurisdiction: | Sixth Circuit |
Cited Cases: | 511 U.S. 661; 461 U.S. 138; 862 F.2d 609; 518 U.S. 668 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 11/01/2000 |
If a plaintiff’s speech was a substantial or motivating factor in his termination, that would form the basis of a constitutional violation. See TA s "Board of County Commr’s v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675" c 1 l "Board of County Commr=s v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 (1996)"Board of County Commr’s v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675-76 (1996). There may be evidence that indicates the same decision to terminate a plaintiff would have been made even in the absence of his protected speech. SeeTA s "Board of County Commr’s v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675" c 1 id. at 675-76.
Motion for Summary Judgment, correctly state the legal principles to be applied in determining whether the discharge of a public employee violates the First Amendment. The first step of the test requires a determination of whether the subject matter of the speech is one that could be fairly characterized as a matter of public concern. TA s "Matulin v. Village of Lodi, 862 F.2d 609, 612 (6th" c 1 l "Matulin v. Village of Lodi, 862 F.2d 609 (6th Cir. 1988)"Matulin v. Village of Lodi, 862 F.2d 609, 612 (6th Cir. 1988). This issue must be determined by examining the “content, form, and context” of the statement. Id. at 612 (citing TA s "Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147-48 (1983)" c 1 l "Connick v. Myers,
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!