Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Business Organizations & Contracts |
Keywords: | Time for performance; Reasonable time; Contract |
Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | 101 N.W. 792 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 03/01/2014 |
The general rule is that when a contract is silent and no time for performance is specified, performance must be within a reasonable time. Hill v. Okay Constr. Co. Inc., 352 N.W.2d 107, 114 (Minn. 1977). “What constitutes a reasonable time depends on the act to be done, the nature of the contract, and all related circumstances.” Tingue v. Patch, 101 N.W. 792, 794 (1904). Thus, the question is one of fact or mixed law and fact for the fact-finder. Bly v. Bublitz, 464 N.W.2d 531, 535 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!