Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Litigation Practice & Procedure, Litigation Practice and Procedure, Torts |
Keywords: | ; Tortfesor; Intentional; Contribution; Contribution Act; Liability |
Jurisdiction: | Illinois |
Cited Cases: | 918 F.Supp. 252 |
Cited Statutes: | None |
Date: | 01/01/2016 |
Intentional tortfeasors cannot seek contribution from other alleged tortfeasors. Ziarko, 161 Ill.2d at 272; Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc., 128 Ill.2d 179, 206 (1989). And there is no dispute that an allegedly negligent tortfeasor can seek contribution from an allegedly intentional tortfeasor. See Long Beach Mortgage Co. v. White, 918 F.Supp. 252, 254 n.3 (N.D. Ill. 1996) ("it would be totally bizarre to preclude a tortfeasor who is even less at fault (negligent rather than wilful and wanton) from obtaining contribution from a tortfeasor who is even more at fault (an intentional rather than merely negligent wrongdoer)"). But the salient point is that any claims for contribution against a settling tortfeasor, regardless of their nature, do not survive a good-faith finding. The language of section 2(d) of the Contribution Act is clear and unambiguous: "The tortfeasor who settles with a claimant pursuant to paragraph (c) is discharged from all liability for any contribution to any other tortfeasor." (Emphasis added.) [statref]740 ILCS 100/2(d) (West 2010)[/statref].
Adgooroo, LLC v. Hechtman, 2016.IL.142531-U (Ill. App. Dist. 1 2016) (not precedential).
Date: January 1, 2016
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!