Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Issue: Are trade fixtures generally considered personal property or the property of the landlord in Minnesota?
| Area of Law: | Real Estate Law |
| Keywords: | Trade fixtures; Personal property |
| Jurisdiction: | Minnesota |
| Cited Cases: | None |
| Cited Statutes: | None |
| Date: | 07/01/2013 |
Generally, trade fixtures are “fixtures used in the conduct of a business” and they are usually regarded as personal property even though affixed to the premises while ordinary fixtures are treated as real property. Wilcox Boiler Co. v. Messier, 1 N.W.2d 130, 132 (Minn. 1941). Ordinarily, a tenant must remove his trade fixtures before the end of the term or they become the property of the landlord. RPC Props. Inc. v. Olson, 2005 WL 1804474 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug 2 2005).
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 411 N.W.2d 582, 583 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987) (the general rule is that a landlord’s subsequent acceptance of rent acts to waive his or her right to rely on any prior alleged breaches of the lease known at that time as a basis for an action).
[…]