Returning Subscriber?
Not a Subscriber to Litigation Pathfinder?
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!
Area of Law: | Bankruptcy & Creditors Rights |
Keywords: | Fraudulent transfer claim; Right to payment |
Jurisdiction: | Federal, Minnesota |
Cited Cases: | None |
Cited Statutes: | Minnesota Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act § 513.45(b); Minn. Stat. § 513.41(3) |
Date: | 02/01/2013 |
In order for a Bank to have a viable fraudulent transfer claim under § 513.45(b) of the Minnesota Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (MUFTA), the Bank must have a proper claim. A “claim” exists only if the creditor challenging the transfer had a “right to payment.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 513.41(3)). A “right to payment” means nothing more or less than an enforceable obligation, see id. (citing Cohen v. De la Cruz, 523 U.S. 213, 218 (1998)). See id. at 4 (citing United States v. Vanornum, 912 F.2d 1023, 1026 (8th Cir. 1990)).
[…]
Subscribe to Litigation Pathfinder
To get the full-text of this Legal Memorandum ... and more!
(Month-to-month and annual subscriptions available)
Get the full text of this legal issue, including links to cited primary law, along with unlimited access 1,000’s of other legal issues…and more!